Collapse AllExpand All

11.1.2. Access Point Emergency and Signaling Survivability Previous topic Parent topic Child topic Next topic

The AP Emergency feature and the signaling survivability feature are not alternatives. Instead, they complement each other. A reliable layer concept for system stability can be implemented in all scenarios containing WAN routes.
  1. Signaling survivability guarantees access point/OpenScape 4000 SoftGate operation over the central control unit in the event of a WAN malfunction. The signaling survivability path is switched over without interruption.
  2. AP Emergency takes over access point/OpenScape 4000 SoftGate operation if the central control unit fails.

Notes:

  • The HSR signaling connection from the APE to the Access Point/OpenScape 4000 SoftGate is always only a pure TCP/IP connection as opposed to a "HSR over UDP" connection (regardless of the SIGMODE configuration in AMO UCSU).
  • There is always only a single HSR signaling connection over a defined path between the APE and Access Point/OpenScape 4000 SoftGate and no alternative survivability path.
Figure 53 “AP Emergency scenario” illustrates a mixed scenario that will be referred to throughout the manual. In this figure, the broken blue lines represent the communication paths between the central control unit and the access points/OpenScape 4000 SoftGates and the red dotted lines represent communication between the survivability units and the access points/OpenScape 4000 SoftGates allocated to them.

Figure 211. AP Emergency scenario

di009d17-2.png